Wilcox, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors, owned 60 percent of the shares of Sterling Corporation. When the market price of Sterling�s shares was $22 per share, Wilcox sold all of his shares in Sterling to Conrad for $29 per share. The minority shareholders of Sterling brought suit against Wilcox demanding a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price. What are the arguments to support the minority shareholders� claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? What are the arguments to reject the minority shareholders� claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? 5-6 pages